In April, Ali Alexander, a outstanding “Stop the Steal” organizer, revealed that he had been served together with his personal grand jury subpoena, asking for data about individuals who organized, spoke at or supplied safety for pro-Trump rallies in Washington after the election, together with Mr. Trump’s incendiary occasion close to the White House on Jan. 6.
Mr. Alexander’s subpoena additionally sought data about members of the manager or legislative branches who could have helped to plan or execute the rallies, or who tried to “obstruct, influence, impede or delay” the certification of the 2020 presidential election.
Last week, phrase emerged that the identical grand jury, sitting in Washington, had extra just lately issued a special set of subpoenas requesting details about the function {that a} group of attorneys near Mr. Trump could have had performed in a plan create alternate slates of pro-Trump electors in key swing states that had been gained by Joseph R. Biden Jr.
The attorneys named in the subpoena included Mr. Trump’s private lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani; Jenna Ellis, who labored with Mr. Giuliani; John Eastman, one of many former president’s chief authorized advisers throughout the postelection interval; and Kenneth Chesebro, who wrote a pair of memos laying out the small print of the plan.
Those subpoenas additionally requested details about any members of the Trump marketing campaign who could been concerned with the alternate elector scheme and about a number of Republican officers in Georgia who took half in it, together with David Shafer, the chairman of the Georgia Republican Party.
Mr. Navarro’s subpoena, by his personal account, was issued by a special grand jury.
In the draft of the go well with he stated he intends to file, he argues that solely Mr. Trump can authorize him to testify. He asks a choose to instruct Mr. Graves, the U.S. lawyer in Washington, to barter his look with Mr. Trump. Mr. Navarro cites Mr. Trump’s invocation of govt privilege over supplies associated to the assault on the Capitol.
(*6*) Mr. Navarro writes. “Rather, as with the committee, the U.S. attorney has constitutional and due process obligations to negotiate my appearance.”
